Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from(X) → cons(X, n__from(n__s(X)))
after(0, XS) → XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → after(N, activate(XS))
from(X) → n__from(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(activate(X))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DirectTerminationProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
from(X) → cons(X, n__from(n__s(X)))
after(0, XS) → XS
after(s(N), cons(X, XS)) → after(N, activate(XS))
from(X) → n__from(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__from(X)) → from(activate(X))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.
Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:
after2 > activate1 > from1 > cons2
after2 > activate1 > from1 > nfrom1
after2 > activate1 > from1 > ns1
after2 > activate1 > s1 > ns1
Status: after2: [1,2]